Is it okay to reference sources consulted not listed in footnotes in Bibliography section of research work ?

No, it is not okay to reference sources that are not listed in footnotes in the Bibliography section of a research work. The purpose of the Bibliography section is to provide a comprehensive list of all the sources that were consulted and cited in the research work. If a source was consulted but not cited in the text, it should not be included in the Bibliography section. It is important to accurately and transparently document all sources that were used in the research work to give credit to the original authors and to allow readers to easily locate and verify the information.

No, it is not okay to reference sources consulted but not listed in footnotes in the Bibliography section of a research work.

The purpose of citations and footnotes is to provide evidence and support for the information presented in the research work. Including a source in the Bibliography without citing it in the footnotes gives the impression that the source was consulted but not used in the research.

Proper academic research requires transparency and accountability for sources used. Here's why it is important to include all consulted sources in both footnotes and the Bibliography:

- Academic Integrity: Omitting sources that were not explicitly cited can be misleading and raise concerns about academic integrity.
- Clarity and Transparency: Providing complete references allows readers to verify the accuracy and credibility of the information presented.
- Consistency and Completeness: A comprehensive Bibliography ensures that all sources consulted are properly acknowledged and allows researchers to easily identify and access the original materials.

Therefore, it is essential to include all sources consulted, whether directly quoted or paraphrased, in both footnotes and the Bibliography section of a research work. This ensures the integrity, transparency, and accuracy of the research.