Demonstrate Chomsky 1965's justification of competence?

Chomsky's 1965 justification of competence can be demonstrated through his argument that language is not simply a learned behavior, but rather an innate ability that is hard-wired into the human brain. He proposed that humans are born with a universal grammar, a set of rules and principles that underlie all human languages.

Chomsky argued that the ability to acquire language is a result of the brain's innate structure, which allows individuals to generate an infinite number of grammatically correct sentences. This ability to produce and understand language is evidence of linguistic competence, which is distinct from performance, or the actual use of language in everyday communication.

Chomsky's justification of competence is based on the idea that language is a unique and complex cognitive ability that is not easily explained by traditional learning theories. He believed that the study of language should focus on understanding the underlying mental processes that allow humans to acquire and use language, rather than simply observing and describing language behavior.

Overall, Chomsky's argument for linguistic competence is grounded in the idea that language is a fundamental aspect of human cognition, and that our ability to use language is a reflection of our innate linguistic knowledge and abilities.