paulo magali
May 15
With examples highlight the main arguements in lexical morphology?
1 view
1 view
2 answers
Sort By
ChatGPT
May 15
1. The argument for the existence of morphemes: Lexical morphology argues that words are composed of smaller units called morphemes, which carry meaning and can be combined in various ways to create new words. For example, in the word "unhappiness," the morphemes "un-" and "-ness" combine to create a new word with a specific meaning.
2. The argument for productivity: Lexical morphology suggests that morphemes can be combined in productive ways to create new words. For example, the suffix "-ize" can be added to a noun to create a verb (e.g. "modernize" from "modern") or to an adjective to create a verb (e.g. "publicize" from "public").
3. The argument for morphological rules: Lexical morphology posits that there are rules governing how morphemes can be combined to form words. For example, in English, the plural form of a noun is often created by adding the suffix "-s" or "-es" (e.g. "cat" becomes "cats" or "box" becomes "boxes").
4. The argument for morphological processes: Lexical morphology also highlights the various processes by which morphemes can be modified or combined to create new words. For example, compounding involves combining two or more words to create a new word (e.g. "blackboard" from "black" and "board"), while derivation involves adding affixes to a base word to create a new word (e.g. "happiness" from "happy").
Overall, lexical morphology emphasizes the importance of morphemes, productivity, rules, and processes in understanding how words are formed and how meaning is conveyed in language.
2. The argument for productivity: Lexical morphology suggests that morphemes can be combined in productive ways to create new words. For example, the suffix "-ize" can be added to a noun to create a verb (e.g. "modernize" from "modern") or to an adjective to create a verb (e.g. "publicize" from "public").
3. The argument for morphological rules: Lexical morphology posits that there are rules governing how morphemes can be combined to form words. For example, in English, the plural form of a noun is often created by adding the suffix "-s" or "-es" (e.g. "cat" becomes "cats" or "box" becomes "boxes").
4. The argument for morphological processes: Lexical morphology also highlights the various processes by which morphemes can be modified or combined to create new words. For example, compounding involves combining two or more words to create a new word (e.g. "blackboard" from "black" and "board"), while derivation involves adding affixes to a base word to create a new word (e.g. "happiness" from "happy").
Overall, lexical morphology emphasizes the importance of morphemes, productivity, rules, and processes in understanding how words are formed and how meaning is conveyed in language.
0
Google Gemini AI
May 15
Main Arguments in Lexical Morphology:
1. Argument from Productivity:
- Claim: Productive processes create an infinite number of new words in a language.
- Example: English prefixation, e.g., the prefix "un-" can be added to numerous verbs to create new words (unfold, untie, unlock).
2. Argument from Compositionality:
- Claim: Meaningful words are composed of smaller meaningful units called morphemes.
- Example: The word "unhappy" consists of the morphemes "un-" (negation) and "happy" (state of joy).
3. Argument from Regularity:
- Claim: There are regular patterns in word formation that can be described by rules.
- Example: English plural formation, e.g., adding "-s" to most nouns (cat -> cats).
4. Argument from Isolation:
- Claim: Morphemes can sometimes exist in isolation as free forms.
- Example: The morpheme "-tion" can appear in both bound form (e.g., "education") and free form (e.g., "action").
5. Argument from Analogy:
- Claim: New words can be created by analogy with existing patterns.
- Example: The word "smog" was coined by analogy with "fog" and "smoke."
6. Argument from Suppletion:
- Claim: Some words do not follow regular patterns of word formation.
- Example: The word "go" has irregular past tense and past participle forms ("went," "gone").
7. Argument from Historical Evidence:
- Claim: Changes in language over time can provide insights into the nature of lexical morphology.
- Example: The historical evolution of English prepositions from independent words to bound morphemes (e.g., "by" was once a noun).
1. Argument from Productivity:
- Claim: Productive processes create an infinite number of new words in a language.
- Example: English prefixation, e.g., the prefix "un-" can be added to numerous verbs to create new words (unfold, untie, unlock).
2. Argument from Compositionality:
- Claim: Meaningful words are composed of smaller meaningful units called morphemes.
- Example: The word "unhappy" consists of the morphemes "un-" (negation) and "happy" (state of joy).
3. Argument from Regularity:
- Claim: There are regular patterns in word formation that can be described by rules.
- Example: English plural formation, e.g., adding "-s" to most nouns (cat -> cats).
4. Argument from Isolation:
- Claim: Morphemes can sometimes exist in isolation as free forms.
- Example: The morpheme "-tion" can appear in both bound form (e.g., "education") and free form (e.g., "action").
5. Argument from Analogy:
- Claim: New words can be created by analogy with existing patterns.
- Example: The word "smog" was coined by analogy with "fog" and "smoke."
6. Argument from Suppletion:
- Claim: Some words do not follow regular patterns of word formation.
- Example: The word "go" has irregular past tense and past participle forms ("went," "gone").
7. Argument from Historical Evidence:
- Claim: Changes in language over time can provide insights into the nature of lexical morphology.
- Example: The historical evolution of English prepositions from independent words to bound morphemes (e.g., "by" was once a noun).
0
