Principle of Locality:
In linguistics, the principle of locality states that linguistic relationships, such as grammatical dependencies, are typically limited to a local domain or window. In other words, elements within a sentence tend to interact with each other more strongly than with elements that are further apart.
Examples:
1. Word Order:
In a sentence like "The boy kicked the ball," the verb "kicked" requires an object, and that object must be "the ball." This is because the object is located within the same local domain as the verb.
2. Long-Distance Dependencies:
While the principle of locality generally holds, there are exceptions. In some languages, such as Japanese or English, long-distance dependencies can occur. For example:
- "Who did John say that Mary had seen?" (English)
- "[Dare ga][dare ni][nani o] okutta no ka]" (Japanese) meaning "Who sent what to whom?"
In these sentences, the elements in brackets are separated by long distances, yet they still form grammatical relationships. However, even in these cases, the dependencies typically follow certain constraints that limit their range.
3. Wh-Movement:
Wh-movement, the process of moving wh-words (e.g., who, what) to the beginning of a sentence, provides another example of locality. In English, wh-words must be moved to a position within a specific domain (called the wh-island) that is local to the embedded clause:
- "I know [what you want]."
- "I don't know [what you are talking about]."
4. Syntactic Islands:
Syntactic islands are constructions that block certain linguistic dependencies. For example, in the sentence "I think that Mary believes that the weather will be nice," the matrix verb "think" governs the embedded clause "that Mary believes that the weather will be nice." However, the embedded clause is an island that prevents the matrix verb from taking the object "Mary" as its complement.
Limitations:
While the principle of locality is a useful generalization, it is not absolute. There are some constructions, such as long-distance dependencies, that violate it. However, the principle still provides a valuable framework for understanding the organization and structure of language.