DICKSON SHILUMBA
Jun 29
What were the seven factors that differentiates Dependent historialgraphy in West Africa and Marxist historialgraphy?
1 view
1 view
2 answers
Sort By
ChatGPT
Jun 29
1. Focus on agency: Dependent historiography in West Africa tends to focus on the role of external forces, such as colonial powers, in shaping historical events, while Marxist historiography emphasizes the agency of social classes in driving historical change.
2. Emphasis on economic factors: Marxist historiography places a strong emphasis on economic factors, such as class struggle and the mode of production, in shaping historical developments, while Dependent historiography may focus more on political and cultural factors.
3. View of colonialism: Dependent historiography in West Africa often views colonialism as a primary factor in shaping the region's history, while Marxist historiography may see colonialism as a manifestation of broader economic and social forces.
4. Perspective on imperialism: Marxist historiography tends to view imperialism as a product of capitalist expansion and exploitation, while Dependent historiography may focus more on the political and cultural impacts of imperialism on colonized societies.
5. Analysis of social structures: Marxist historiography typically analyzes historical events through the lens of social class structures and relations, while Dependent historiography may also consider factors such as ethnicity, religion, and gender.
6. Approach to historical sources: Marxist historiography often emphasizes the importance of analyzing primary sources and material conditions in understanding historical events, while Dependent historiography may also draw on oral traditions and other non-traditional sources.
7. Political implications: Marxist historiography is often associated with a revolutionary political agenda aimed at challenging capitalist systems, while Dependent historiography may focus more on advocating for decolonization and self-determination in post-colonial societies.
2. Emphasis on economic factors: Marxist historiography places a strong emphasis on economic factors, such as class struggle and the mode of production, in shaping historical developments, while Dependent historiography may focus more on political and cultural factors.
3. View of colonialism: Dependent historiography in West Africa often views colonialism as a primary factor in shaping the region's history, while Marxist historiography may see colonialism as a manifestation of broader economic and social forces.
4. Perspective on imperialism: Marxist historiography tends to view imperialism as a product of capitalist expansion and exploitation, while Dependent historiography may focus more on the political and cultural impacts of imperialism on colonized societies.
5. Analysis of social structures: Marxist historiography typically analyzes historical events through the lens of social class structures and relations, while Dependent historiography may also consider factors such as ethnicity, religion, and gender.
6. Approach to historical sources: Marxist historiography often emphasizes the importance of analyzing primary sources and material conditions in understanding historical events, while Dependent historiography may also draw on oral traditions and other non-traditional sources.
7. Political implications: Marxist historiography is often associated with a revolutionary political agenda aimed at challenging capitalist systems, while Dependent historiography may focus more on advocating for decolonization and self-determination in post-colonial societies.
0
Google Gemini AI
Jun 29
1. Chronology: Dependent historiography emphasizes the pre-colonial period and sees the colonial period as a disruption, while Marxist historiography focuses on the colonial period as a period of exploitation and class struggle.
2. Causality: Dependent historiography sees external factors as the primary causes of African history, while Marxist historiography sees internal factors, such as class struggle, as the primary causes.
3. Agency: Dependent historiography often downplays the agency of Africans, while Marxist historiography emphasizes the role of African workers and peasants in shaping history.
4. Structure: Dependent historiography sees African societies as static and unchanging, while Marxist historiography sees them as dynamic and constantly evolving.
5. Ideology: Dependent historiography is often apologistic towards colonialism, while Marxist historiography is critical of colonialism.
6. Methodology: Dependent historiography relies heavily on written sources, while Marxist historiography uses a wider range of sources, including oral histories and archaeological data.
7. Objectives: Dependent historiography aims to provide a comprehensive history of Africa, while Marxist historiography aims to explain the present by examining the past.
2. Causality: Dependent historiography sees external factors as the primary causes of African history, while Marxist historiography sees internal factors, such as class struggle, as the primary causes.
3. Agency: Dependent historiography often downplays the agency of Africans, while Marxist historiography emphasizes the role of African workers and peasants in shaping history.
4. Structure: Dependent historiography sees African societies as static and unchanging, while Marxist historiography sees them as dynamic and constantly evolving.
5. Ideology: Dependent historiography is often apologistic towards colonialism, while Marxist historiography is critical of colonialism.
6. Methodology: Dependent historiography relies heavily on written sources, while Marxist historiography uses a wider range of sources, including oral histories and archaeological data.
7. Objectives: Dependent historiography aims to provide a comprehensive history of Africa, while Marxist historiography aims to explain the present by examining the past.
0
