What is Shula Mark's and Stanley Trapido's perspective about the South African war of 1899-1902?

Shula Marks and Stanley Trapido, both prominent historians, have provided different perspectives on the South African War of 1899-1902.

Shula Marks, a British historian, has focused on the social and economic aspects of the war. She argues that the war was not solely about the political struggle between the British Empire and the Boer republics, but also about the control of resources, particularly gold and diamonds. Marks emphasizes the impact of the war on the African population, highlighting their displacement, forced labor, and loss of livelihoods. She also examines the role of African communities in the war, challenging the traditional narrative that portrays them as passive victims.

On the other hand, Stanley Trapido, a South African historian, has focused on the political and ideological dimensions of the war. He argues that the conflict was a result of competing nationalisms and the desire for political control. Trapido emphasizes the role of British imperialism and the expansionist ambitions of the British Empire. He also explores the complex dynamics between the British, Boer, and African communities, highlighting the alliances and divisions that emerged during the war.

Overall, while both Marks and Trapido acknowledge the political, economic, and social complexities of the South African War, they offer different perspectives on the causes and consequences of the conflict. Marks emphasizes the economic factors and the impact on African communities, while Trapido focuses on the political and ideological dimensions of the war.