Surrender and revocation are two different processes related to patents.
1. Surrender of Patents: Surrendering a patent refers to the voluntary act of the patent owner giving up their rights to the patent. This can be done for various reasons, such as if the patent owner no longer wishes to maintain the patent, if they believe the patent is invalid, or if they want to avoid paying maintenance fees. By surrendering the patent, the patent owner effectively terminates their rights, and the patent ceases to exist.
2. Revocation of Patents: Revocation of a patent, on the other hand, is a process initiated by a third party or the patent office to challenge the validity of a patent. If someone believes that a patent was granted in error, or if they have evidence that the patent is invalid or should not have been granted, they can file a revocation request with the relevant patent office. The revocation process involves presenting evidence and arguments to prove that the patent should be revoked. If the patent office determines that the patent is indeed invalid, it may be revoked, and the patent owner's rights are terminated.
Both surrender and revocation can result in the termination of a patent, but the key difference is that surrender is a voluntary act by the patent owner, while revocation is a legal process initiated by a third party or the patent office to challenge the validity of the patent.