In argumentative essay format are the on Black Wednesday 10th January 2024 actions/ behaviour of people involved justified?

In any situation where people are involved, their actions and behavior can be subject to scrutiny and debate. Whether or not these actions are justified depends on a variety of factors, including the context of the situation, the intentions behind the actions, and the consequences of those actions.

One common argument for justifying people's actions is the concept of self-defense. If someone is acting in self-defense, they are typically seen as justified in their actions, as they are simply trying to protect themselves from harm. For example, if someone is being physically attacked and they fight back in order to defend themselves, their actions can be seen as justified.

Another argument for justifying people's actions is the idea of necessity. If someone is faced with a situation where they have no other choice but to act in a certain way, their actions may be considered justified. For example, if someone steals food in order to feed their starving family, their actions may be seen as necessary and therefore justified.

On the other hand, there are also situations where people's actions are not justified. For example, if someone acts out of malice or with the intention of causing harm to others, their actions are typically not considered justified. Additionally, if someone's actions result in harm to others without any valid reason, their actions may also be seen as unjustified.

In conclusion, whether or not the actions and behavior of people involved in a situation are justified depends on a variety of factors. While self-defense and necessity can often justify actions, malice and harm to others without reason typically do not. It is important to consider the context, intentions, and consequences of people's actions in order to determine whether or not they are justified.

Black Wednesday on Papua New Guinea as a country are the actions of people involved justified