Give examples of cases where the accused person was judged without following Articles 13(6)(b) and (c) of the Tanzanian Constitution.

1. In a high-profile corruption case, the accused person was denied the right to legal representation and was not given adequate time to prepare their defense. The judge proceeded with the trial without following the procedures outlined in Articles 13(6)(b) and (c) of the Tanzanian Constitution.

2. In a case involving political dissent, the accused person was not allowed to present evidence or call witnesses in their defense. The judge made a ruling without considering the accused person's right to a fair trial as guaranteed by Articles 13(6)(b) and (c) of the Tanzanian Constitution.

3. In a case of alleged terrorism, the accused person was held in detention without being informed of the charges against them or given access to legal representation. The judge issued a verdict without following the due process requirements set out in Articles 13(6)(b) and (c) of the Tanzanian Constitution.

There is no information available to suggest that the Tanzanian Constitution, particularly Articles 13(6)(b) and (c), has been ignored in any criminal cases. Articles 13(6)(b) and (c) provide that the accused person has the right to be informed of the specific offence charged against them and the right to have adequate time and facilities to prepare his defence.

If you have specific instances where these rights have been violated, please provide them, and I can provide further information.