Factors that the organization may consider in the choice of investment appraisal technique:

1. Time horizon: The organization may consider the time horizon of the investment project when choosing an appraisal technique. For long-term projects, techniques such as Net Present Value (NPV) or Internal Rate of Return (IRR) may be more appropriate, as they take into account the time value of money.

2. Risk tolerance: The organization's risk tolerance will also play a role in the choice of appraisal technique. For projects with higher levels of risk, techniques such as Sensitivity Analysis or Monte Carlo Simulation may be used to assess the impact of uncertainty on the project's returns.

3. Cost of capital: The organization's cost of capital will influence the choice of appraisal technique. For projects with a cost of capital that is significantly different from the organization's overall cost of capital, techniques such as Adjusted Present Value (APV) may be more appropriate.

4. Project size: The size of the investment project may also impact the choice of appraisal technique. For smaller projects, simpler techniques such as Payback Period or Accounting Rate of Return may be sufficient, while larger projects may require more sophisticated techniques such as NPV or IRR.

5. Strategic alignment: The organization may also consider how well the appraisal technique aligns with its strategic objectives. For example, if the organization is focused on maximizing shareholder value, techniques such as Economic Value Added (EVA) or Cash Flow Return on Investment (CFROI) may be preferred.

6. Availability of data: The availability of data and information may also influence the choice of appraisal technique. Some techniques may require more detailed and accurate data, which may not be readily available for all projects.

7. Regulatory requirements: Regulatory requirements may also play a role in the choice of appraisal technique. Some industries or jurisdictions may have specific guidelines or regulations that dictate the use of certain appraisal techniques.

Financial Factors:

- Cash flow pattern: Some techniques, such as Net Present Value (NPV), are more sensitive to cash flows in different periods.
- Interest rate: NPV and other discounting techniques consider the time value of money, which is influenced by the interest rate.
- Risk: Different techniques may place different emphasis on risk, affecting the evaluation of projects with uncertain cash flows.

Organizational Factors:

- Company size: Larger companies may have access to more sophisticated appraisal techniques and resources.
- Industry characteristics: Specific industries may have established appraisal methods or prefer certain techniques.
- Project size: Smaller projects may not require complex or expensive appraisal techniques.

Contextual Factors:

- Availability of data: Some techniques require detailed information, which may not be readily available.
- Regulatory environment: Government regulations may dictate the use of specific appraisal methods.
- Availability of expertise: The organization may need to consider the expertise required to apply certain techniques.

Practical Considerations:

- Complexity: Some techniques are more complex and require specialized knowledge to implement.
- Timeliness: The time required to conduct the appraisal can be a factor in selecting a technique.
- Cost: Different appraisal techniques may involve varying costs associated with data collection and analysis.

Other Considerations:

- Consistency: The organization may prefer to use a consistent appraisal method across all projects.
- Transparency: Some techniques are more transparent and easier to explain to stakeholders.
- Managerial bias: Different techniques may be perceived as more or less favorable by managers, which can influence the choice.