Anonymous
Aug 28
Ethiopian law of evidence falls under both civil and common law legal system. Exhaustively discuss the points where it shares civil law legal system and common law legal system?
Law of evidence
1 view
1 view
2 answers
Sort By
ChatGPT
Aug 28
Ethiopian law of evidence shares aspects of both civil law and common law legal systems in various ways.
1. Civil Law System:
- In the civil law system, the primary source of law is statutory law, which is enacted by the legislature. Similarly, in Ethiopian law, the Evidence Law of Ethiopia is primarily based on statutory law, specifically the Evidence Law of Ethiopia Proclamation No. 691/2010.
- In civil law systems, judges play a more passive role in the trial process, primarily acting as neutral arbiters of the law. In Ethiopian law, judges are expected to adhere strictly to the rules of evidence as outlined in the Evidence Law, ensuring a fair and impartial trial process.
- The civil law system emphasizes the written law and legal codes, which are used as the basis for legal decisions. Similarly, in Ethiopian law, the Evidence Law provides a comprehensive framework for the admissibility and evaluation of evidence in court proceedings.
2. Common Law System:
- In the common law system, judicial precedent plays a significant role in shaping the law. While Ethiopian law is primarily based on statutory law, judicial decisions and precedents also play a role in interpreting and applying the Evidence Law in practice.
- Common law systems place a strong emphasis on the adversarial nature of legal proceedings, with parties presenting evidence and arguments to support their case. In Ethiopian law, the adversarial system is also followed, with parties responsible for presenting evidence to support their claims and defenses.
- The common law system allows for the development of case law through judicial decisions, which can influence future legal interpretations. In Ethiopian law, judicial decisions and interpretations of the Evidence Law can also shape the application of evidence rules in court proceedings.
Overall, the Ethiopian law of evidence shares aspects of both civil law and common law legal systems, incorporating elements of statutory law, judicial precedent, and an adversarial trial process. By drawing on these different legal traditions, the Ethiopian legal system seeks to ensure a fair and effective process for the presentation and evaluation of evidence in court proceedings.
1. Civil Law System:
- In the civil law system, the primary source of law is statutory law, which is enacted by the legislature. Similarly, in Ethiopian law, the Evidence Law of Ethiopia is primarily based on statutory law, specifically the Evidence Law of Ethiopia Proclamation No. 691/2010.
- In civil law systems, judges play a more passive role in the trial process, primarily acting as neutral arbiters of the law. In Ethiopian law, judges are expected to adhere strictly to the rules of evidence as outlined in the Evidence Law, ensuring a fair and impartial trial process.
- The civil law system emphasizes the written law and legal codes, which are used as the basis for legal decisions. Similarly, in Ethiopian law, the Evidence Law provides a comprehensive framework for the admissibility and evaluation of evidence in court proceedings.
2. Common Law System:
- In the common law system, judicial precedent plays a significant role in shaping the law. While Ethiopian law is primarily based on statutory law, judicial decisions and precedents also play a role in interpreting and applying the Evidence Law in practice.
- Common law systems place a strong emphasis on the adversarial nature of legal proceedings, with parties presenting evidence and arguments to support their case. In Ethiopian law, the adversarial system is also followed, with parties responsible for presenting evidence to support their claims and defenses.
- The common law system allows for the development of case law through judicial decisions, which can influence future legal interpretations. In Ethiopian law, judicial decisions and interpretations of the Evidence Law can also shape the application of evidence rules in court proceedings.
Overall, the Ethiopian law of evidence shares aspects of both civil law and common law legal systems, incorporating elements of statutory law, judicial precedent, and an adversarial trial process. By drawing on these different legal traditions, the Ethiopian legal system seeks to ensure a fair and effective process for the presentation and evaluation of evidence in court proceedings.
0
Google Gemini AI
Aug 28
Points Where Ethiopian Law of Evidence Shares Civil Law Legal System:
- Codification: Like civil law systems, the Ethiopian Law of Evidence is codified in a comprehensive statute. The Federal Evidence Proclamation (No. 244/2012) provides a systematic and detailed set of rules governing the admissibility and evaluation of evidence.
- Emphasis on Written Evidence: Civil law systems place great importance on written evidence, and the Ethiopian Law of Evidence reflects this. Documentary evidence, such as contracts, official records, and correspondence, is generally accorded higher weight than oral testimony.
- Role of the Judge: Judges in civil law systems have an active role in gathering and presenting evidence. Under the Ethiopian Law of Evidence, the judge may examine witnesses, order the production of documents, and generally assist in the establishment of a complete and accurate record.
- Emphasis on Facts: Civil law systems focus on establishing the facts of a case rather than on determining the legal principles that apply. The Ethiopian Law of Evidence provides specific rules for proving facts, including the use of presumptions, inferences, and corroboration.
- Exclusionary Rule: The Ethiopian Law of Evidence includes an exclusionary rule similar to that found in civil law systems. Illegally obtained evidence is generally inadmissible in court, protecting the rights of individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Points Where Ethiopian Law of Evidence Shares Common Law Legal System:
- Burden of Proof: In common law systems, the burden of proof rests on the party asserting a claim. The Ethiopian Law of Evidence adopts this principle, requiring the party who brings an action to prove their allegations by a preponderance of the evidence.
- Witnesses: Common law systems have a strong tradition of witness testimony. The Ethiopian Law of Evidence provides detailed rules regarding the competency and examination of witnesses, including the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses.
- Hearsay Rule: The hearsay rule is a key feature of common law systems. The Ethiopian Law of Evidence includes a hearsay exception that allows certain out-of-court statements to be admitted as evidence under specific circumstances.
- Admissibility of Expert Testimony: Expert testimony is commonly admitted in common law systems to assist the jury in understanding complex or technical issues. The Ethiopian Law of Evidence provides guidelines for the admissibility and use of expert testimony, ensuring that it is relevant, reliable, and helpful to the court.
- Balancing Test: In both the common law and Ethiopian legal systems, courts apply a balancing test when determining whether to admit evidence that may raise concerns about prejudice, confusion, or time consumption.
- Codification: Like civil law systems, the Ethiopian Law of Evidence is codified in a comprehensive statute. The Federal Evidence Proclamation (No. 244/2012) provides a systematic and detailed set of rules governing the admissibility and evaluation of evidence.
- Emphasis on Written Evidence: Civil law systems place great importance on written evidence, and the Ethiopian Law of Evidence reflects this. Documentary evidence, such as contracts, official records, and correspondence, is generally accorded higher weight than oral testimony.
- Role of the Judge: Judges in civil law systems have an active role in gathering and presenting evidence. Under the Ethiopian Law of Evidence, the judge may examine witnesses, order the production of documents, and generally assist in the establishment of a complete and accurate record.
- Emphasis on Facts: Civil law systems focus on establishing the facts of a case rather than on determining the legal principles that apply. The Ethiopian Law of Evidence provides specific rules for proving facts, including the use of presumptions, inferences, and corroboration.
- Exclusionary Rule: The Ethiopian Law of Evidence includes an exclusionary rule similar to that found in civil law systems. Illegally obtained evidence is generally inadmissible in court, protecting the rights of individuals from unreasonable searches and seizures.
Points Where Ethiopian Law of Evidence Shares Common Law Legal System:
- Burden of Proof: In common law systems, the burden of proof rests on the party asserting a claim. The Ethiopian Law of Evidence adopts this principle, requiring the party who brings an action to prove their allegations by a preponderance of the evidence.
- Witnesses: Common law systems have a strong tradition of witness testimony. The Ethiopian Law of Evidence provides detailed rules regarding the competency and examination of witnesses, including the right to cross-examine adverse witnesses.
- Hearsay Rule: The hearsay rule is a key feature of common law systems. The Ethiopian Law of Evidence includes a hearsay exception that allows certain out-of-court statements to be admitted as evidence under specific circumstances.
- Admissibility of Expert Testimony: Expert testimony is commonly admitted in common law systems to assist the jury in understanding complex or technical issues. The Ethiopian Law of Evidence provides guidelines for the admissibility and use of expert testimony, ensuring that it is relevant, reliable, and helpful to the court.
- Balancing Test: In both the common law and Ethiopian legal systems, courts apply a balancing test when determining whether to admit evidence that may raise concerns about prejudice, confusion, or time consumption.
0
