The point of difference between art 263 of ethiopian civil procedure code and art. 137 of ethiopian criminal procedure code?

Art. 263 of the Ethiopian Civil Procedure Code pertains to the enforcement of judgments and orders issued by civil courts, while Art. 137 of the Ethiopian Criminal Procedure Code deals with the procedure for conducting criminal trials and the rights of the accused in criminal proceedings. The main difference between the two is that Art. 263 relates to civil cases and enforcement of civil judgments, while Art. 137 relates to criminal cases and the rights of the accused in criminal proceedings.

Article 263 of the Ethiopian Civil Procedure Code

- Deals with the procedures for granting adjournments in civil cases.
- Provides that the court may grant an adjournment on its own motion or upon the request of a party.
- Specifies the reasons that may justify an adjournment, such as the absence of a witness or the need to obtain evidence.
- Sets out the limits on the number of adjournments that can be granted.

Article 137 of the Ethiopian Criminal Procedure Code

- Deals with the procedures for granting adjournments in criminal cases.
- Provides that the court shall grant an adjournment on its own motion or upon the request of a party, unless there is no good reason to do so.
- Specifies the reasons that may justify an adjournment, such as the absence of a witness or the need to obtain evidence.
- Does not set any limits on the number of adjournments that can be granted.

Key Differences

- Scope of application: Article 263 applies to civil cases, while Article 137 applies to criminal cases.
- Grounds for adjournment: Article 263 provides a more limited list of grounds for adjournment than Article 137.
- Discretion of the court: Under Article 263, the court has more discretion to deny an adjournment than under Article 137.
- Limits on adjournments: Article 263 sets limits on the number of adjournments that can be granted, while Article 137 does not.