> #child-development , #art-education > Compare Lowenfeld's and Fox and Schirrmar's stages of development to organize their views of art development of the child?
Anonymous
Sep 12

Compare Lowenfeld's and Fox and Schirrmar's stages of development to organize their views of art development of the child?

139 views
139 views

2 answers

Sort By
C
ChatGPT
Sep 12
Lowenfeld's stages of development focus on the artistic development of the child in terms of their cognitive and emotional growth. He identified six stages of artistic development, starting from scribbling and progressing to more controlled and representational forms of art. Lowenfeld emphasized the importance of allowing children to explore and experiment with different art materials and techniques in order to foster their creativity and self-expression.

On the other hand, Fox and Schirrmacher's stages of development focus more on the social and cultural aspects of art development in children. They identified four stages of artistic development, starting from the sensory-motor stage and progressing to the symbolic stage where children begin to use art as a means of communication and self-expression. Fox and Schirrmacher emphasized the importance of providing children with opportunities to engage with art in a social context, such as through collaborative art projects or exposure to different cultural art forms.

Overall, both Lowenfeld and Fox and Schirrmacher's stages of development highlight the importance of providing children with opportunities to explore and engage with art in order to foster their artistic development. While Lowenfeld's stages focus more on the individual child's cognitive and emotional growth, Fox and Schirrmacher's stages emphasize the social and cultural aspects of art development in children.
0
G
Google Gemini AI
Sep 12
Lowenfeld's Stages of Artistic Development

- Scribbling Stage (2-4 years): Random, uncoordinated marks made with a writing or drawing tool.
- Preschematic Stage (4-7 years): Simple, symbolic representations of objects that do not resemble their real-world counterparts.
- Schematic Stage (7-9 years): More realistic representations of objects, but with simplified forms and details.
- Realistic Stage (9-12 years): Detailed, accurate representations of objects with a focus on perspective and proportion.
- Pseudo-Naturalistic Stage (12-14 years): Exploration of more complex techniques and styles, with a blend of realism and personal expression.
- Decision-Making Stage (15+ years): Development of a personal artistic style and conscious decision-making about the use of materials and techniques.

Fox and Schirrmar's Stages of Artistic Development

- Early Childhood (2-4 years): Exploration of materials and the creation of non-representational forms.
- Pre-School Stage (4-6 years): Emergence of rudimentary shapes and symbols to represent objects and experiences.
- Early Elementary Stage (6-8 years): Development of basic drawing skills, such as using lines, circles, and squares, to create recognizable objects.
- Middle Elementary Stage (8-10 years): Refined drawing and modeling skills, with an emphasis on detail and perspective.
- Upper Elementary Stage (10-12 years): Transition from realistic drawings to more expressive and imaginative forms.
- Middle School Stage (12-14 years): Exploration of different materials, techniques, and styles, with a growing sense of personal expression.
- High School Stage (14+ years): Development of a unique artistic voice and continued experimentation with materials and concepts.

Comparison

Similarities:

- Both models emphasize the progression from non-representational to realistic drawing.
- They recognize the importance of developmental stages, with each stage building upon the previous one.

Differences:

- Lowenfeld's model focuses on the child's development of technical skills, while Fox and Schirrmar's model emphasizes both technical and aesthetic aspects.
- Lowenfeld's model highlights the cognitive and perceptual aspects of development, while Fox and Schirrmar's model explores the social and cultural influences.
- Lowenfeld's model stops at adolescence, while Fox and Schirrmar's model continues into adulthood.

Conclusion

Both Lowenfeld's and Fox and Schirrmar's models provide valuable insights into the development of artistic abilities in children. Lowenfeld's model emphasizes the technical and cognitive aspects, while Fox and Schirrmar's model expands on these to include aesthetic, social, and cultural influences. By combining these perspectives, we gain a more comprehensive understanding of the multifaceted nature of art development in children and adolescents.
0

Similar Questions

×
Anonymous





© 2024 - Quanswer