Tadei Sanga
Feb 11
Why pleasure is not considered as an activity and happnnes is activity by aristotle 5 point?
1 view
1 view
1 answer
Sort By
ChatGPT
Feb 11
According to Aristotle, pleasure is not considered as an activity while happiness is considered as an activity for the following reasons:
1. Pleasure is a passive experience: Aristotle argues that pleasure is a passive sensation that arises from the satisfaction of desires or the absence of pain. It does not involve any active engagement or pursuit of a higher goal. In contrast, happiness is an active state that involves the cultivation of virtues and the pursuit of a meaningful life.
2. Pleasure is temporary: Aristotle believes that pleasure is a fleeting sensation that comes and goes. It is not a lasting state of being. Happiness, on the other hand, is a more enduring and stable condition that arises from living a virtuous life and achieving eudaimonia (flourishing).
3. Pleasure can be derived from base or immoral activities: Aristotle argues that pleasure can be derived from activities that are base, immoral, or harmful in the long run. For example, indulging in excessive eating or drinking may provide temporary pleasure but can lead to negative consequences. Happiness, in contrast, is associated with engaging in virtuous actions that promote the well-being of oneself and others.
4. Pleasure is subjective: Aristotle suggests that pleasure is a subjective experience that varies from person to person. What brings pleasure to one individual may not bring pleasure to another. Happiness, however, is a more objective and universal concept that is linked to the fulfillment of human potential and the cultivation of virtues.
5. Pleasure is not the ultimate goal: Aristotle argues that pleasure is not the ultimate goal of human life. While it may be a desirable byproduct of virtuous actions, it is not the primary aim. Happiness, on the other hand, is considered the ultimate goal as it encompasses a holistic sense of well-being and fulfillment that goes beyond mere pleasure.
1. Pleasure is a passive experience: Aristotle argues that pleasure is a passive sensation that arises from the satisfaction of desires or the absence of pain. It does not involve any active engagement or pursuit of a higher goal. In contrast, happiness is an active state that involves the cultivation of virtues and the pursuit of a meaningful life.
2. Pleasure is temporary: Aristotle believes that pleasure is a fleeting sensation that comes and goes. It is not a lasting state of being. Happiness, on the other hand, is a more enduring and stable condition that arises from living a virtuous life and achieving eudaimonia (flourishing).
3. Pleasure can be derived from base or immoral activities: Aristotle argues that pleasure can be derived from activities that are base, immoral, or harmful in the long run. For example, indulging in excessive eating or drinking may provide temporary pleasure but can lead to negative consequences. Happiness, in contrast, is associated with engaging in virtuous actions that promote the well-being of oneself and others.
4. Pleasure is subjective: Aristotle suggests that pleasure is a subjective experience that varies from person to person. What brings pleasure to one individual may not bring pleasure to another. Happiness, however, is a more objective and universal concept that is linked to the fulfillment of human potential and the cultivation of virtues.
5. Pleasure is not the ultimate goal: Aristotle argues that pleasure is not the ultimate goal of human life. While it may be a desirable byproduct of virtuous actions, it is not the primary aim. Happiness, on the other hand, is considered the ultimate goal as it encompasses a holistic sense of well-being and fulfillment that goes beyond mere pleasure.
0
