The statement "the subject matter of history is the society" implies that the primary focus of historical study is the examination and understanding of societies and their development over time. This perspective suggests that history is not solely concerned with political events or individual actions, but rather with the broader social, cultural, economic, and political contexts in which these events occur.
To support this statement, references and citations from various historians and scholars can be provided. Here are a few examples:
1. E.H. Carr, a prominent historian, argued in his book "What is History?" that history should be seen as a study of society. He stated, "History is a continuous process of interaction between the historian and his facts, an unending dialogue between the present and the past." (Carr, 1961, p. 23) Carr emphasized the importance of understanding the social structures, institutions, and ideologies that shape historical events.
2. Fernand Braudel, a renowned French historian, introduced the concept of "total history" in his work "The Mediterranean and the Mediterranean World in the Age of Philip II." Braudel believed that history should encompass all aspects of society, including geography, economics, and culture. He argued that by studying the long-term structures and processes of society, historians can gain a deeper understanding of historical events. (Braudel, 1972)
3. The Annales School, a group of French historians including Marc Bloch and Lucien Febvre, emphasized the importance of social history. They advocated for a multidisciplinary approach to history, incorporating sociology, anthropology, and geography. According to Febvre, "History is the study of human societies in time and space." (Febvre, 1949, p. 3) The Annales School's approach focused on long-term social structures and the collective experiences of societies.
4. The Marxist perspective also supports the idea that history is primarily concerned with society. Marxist historians, such as Eric Hobsbawm, argue that historical events should be analyzed within the framework of class struggle and economic relations. Hobsbawm stated, "History is not just a matter of events, but of the social and economic structures within which they occur." (Hobsbawm, 1994, p. 1) This perspective emphasizes the role of social classes and economic systems in shaping historical developments.
In conclusion, the statement that "the subject matter of history is the society" is supported by various references and citations from historians and scholars. These sources highlight the importance of studying social structures, cultural dynamics, economic systems, and political contexts to gain a comprehensive understanding of historical events. By examining society as a whole, historians can provide a more nuanced and holistic interpretation of the past.