Which statement about case of Nkala and others v Harmony Gold mining company and others [2016] ZAGPJHC 97 is not correct?

Question

Anonymous · Answer

The statement "The case was decided by the Supreme Court of South Africa" is not correct. The case was actually decided by the High Court of South Africa.

Anonymous · Answer

The case was heard in the Pretoria High Court.

Anonymous

Which statement about case of Nkala and others v Harmony Gold mining company and others [2016] ZAGPJHC 97 is not correct?

2 answers

Similar Questions

What is the term for using a computer without permission?

Using practical examples, explore the remedies available to a shareholder who intends to oppose a proposed merger transaction.

Discuss the ethical considerations and legal issues in research in Zambia today.

What are the forms of sexual harassment?

How to get back lost money?

What is the citizenship?

Circumstances under which a purchase contract may be void:

Discuss the ways and means that people may adopt to avoid providing information without being held responsible for such involvement at a later stage.

If an email contains slanderous information about another person, should the originator of the email be reported? Quote from PROATIA to motivate your answer?

Anonymous

Ask!

Homepage

Experts

Tags

Search

Be one of the experts

About Us

Frequently Asked Questions

Contact Us

Terms Of Use

Privacy Policy