Elizabeth Loishorwa
Feb 21
Rostow theory of development of economic development appears to suggest that underdevelopment is a result of endogenous factors(ie internal forces) using examples of your choice,critically discuss?
1 view
1 view
1 answer
Sort By
ChatGPT
Feb 21
Rostow's theory of economic development, also known as the "stages of economic growth," posits that all countries go through a series of stages of development, starting from traditional society to the age of high mass consumption. Rostow argues that underdevelopment is primarily caused by internal factors within a country, such as lack of investment, technological innovation, and institutional development.
One example that supports Rostow's theory is the case of South Korea. In the 1960s, South Korea was a poor and underdeveloped country with a primarily agrarian economy. However, through strong government intervention, investment in education and infrastructure, and a focus on export-led industrialization, South Korea was able to rapidly industrialize and achieve high levels of economic growth. This example demonstrates how internal factors, such as government policies and investment decisions, can play a crucial role in driving economic development.
On the other hand, critics of Rostow's theory argue that it oversimplifies the complex process of economic development and fails to account for external factors that can also contribute to underdevelopment. For example, colonialism and imperialism have had a significant impact on the economic development of many countries, as they have exploited resources and hindered local industries. Additionally, global economic forces, such as trade policies and market fluctuations, can also influence a country's development trajectory.
Furthermore, Rostow's theory has been criticized for its linear and deterministic view of development, which assumes that all countries will inevitably progress through the same stages of growth. In reality, the path to development is not always straightforward and can be influenced by a myriad of factors, including political instability, social inequality, and environmental challenges.
In conclusion, while Rostow's theory of economic development emphasizes the importance of internal factors in driving economic growth, it is important to consider the broader context in which development occurs. External forces, such as historical legacies and global economic dynamics, can also shape a country's development trajectory and should not be overlooked in discussions of underdevelopment.
One example that supports Rostow's theory is the case of South Korea. In the 1960s, South Korea was a poor and underdeveloped country with a primarily agrarian economy. However, through strong government intervention, investment in education and infrastructure, and a focus on export-led industrialization, South Korea was able to rapidly industrialize and achieve high levels of economic growth. This example demonstrates how internal factors, such as government policies and investment decisions, can play a crucial role in driving economic development.
On the other hand, critics of Rostow's theory argue that it oversimplifies the complex process of economic development and fails to account for external factors that can also contribute to underdevelopment. For example, colonialism and imperialism have had a significant impact on the economic development of many countries, as they have exploited resources and hindered local industries. Additionally, global economic forces, such as trade policies and market fluctuations, can also influence a country's development trajectory.
Furthermore, Rostow's theory has been criticized for its linear and deterministic view of development, which assumes that all countries will inevitably progress through the same stages of growth. In reality, the path to development is not always straightforward and can be influenced by a myriad of factors, including political instability, social inequality, and environmental challenges.
In conclusion, while Rostow's theory of economic development emphasizes the importance of internal factors in driving economic growth, it is important to consider the broader context in which development occurs. External forces, such as historical legacies and global economic dynamics, can also shape a country's development trajectory and should not be overlooked in discussions of underdevelopment.
0
