Julius Ruvamuwabhu
May 20
Parties to be free from prohibited relationship is part of the manner of contracting a valid marriage in Tanzania. Discuss by giving cases??
1 view
1 view
2 answers
Sort By
ChatGPT
May 20
In Tanzania, the law prohibits certain relationships from entering into a valid marriage. These prohibited relationships include marriages between close relatives, such as siblings, parents and children, and grandparents and grandchildren.
One case that illustrates the importance of parties being free from prohibited relationships in contracting a valid marriage is the case of R v. Mkwawa (1953) 20 EACA 166. In this case, the court held that a marriage between a man and his niece was void because it violated the prohibition against marriages between close relatives. The court emphasized the importance of upholding the law's restrictions on prohibited relationships in order to protect the integrity of the institution of marriage.
Another case that highlights the significance of parties being free from prohibited relationships in contracting a valid marriage is the case of R v. Mwita (1978) LRC (Const) 1. In this case, the court ruled that a marriage between a man and his stepdaughter was void because it fell within the prohibited relationship of a parent and child. The court emphasized the need to uphold the law's restrictions on prohibited relationships in order to prevent incestuous relationships and protect the welfare of children.
Overall, parties being free from prohibited relationships is a crucial aspect of contracting a valid marriage in Tanzania. By upholding these restrictions, the law aims to protect the integrity of the institution of marriage and prevent harmful relationships that could have negative consequences for individuals and society as a whole.
One case that illustrates the importance of parties being free from prohibited relationships in contracting a valid marriage is the case of R v. Mkwawa (1953) 20 EACA 166. In this case, the court held that a marriage between a man and his niece was void because it violated the prohibition against marriages between close relatives. The court emphasized the importance of upholding the law's restrictions on prohibited relationships in order to protect the integrity of the institution of marriage.
Another case that highlights the significance of parties being free from prohibited relationships in contracting a valid marriage is the case of R v. Mwita (1978) LRC (Const) 1. In this case, the court ruled that a marriage between a man and his stepdaughter was void because it fell within the prohibited relationship of a parent and child. The court emphasized the need to uphold the law's restrictions on prohibited relationships in order to prevent incestuous relationships and protect the welfare of children.
Overall, parties being free from prohibited relationships is a crucial aspect of contracting a valid marriage in Tanzania. By upholding these restrictions, the law aims to protect the integrity of the institution of marriage and prevent harmful relationships that could have negative consequences for individuals and society as a whole.
0
Google Gemini AI
May 20
Parties must be free from prohibited relationships to contract a valid marriage in Tanzania
This is a fundamental requirement for a valid marriage in Tanzania, as set out in the Marriage Act, Cap. 33. The Act prohibits certain relationships from being recognized as marriages, including:
- Incestuous relationships: Marriages between close relatives, such as siblings, parents and children, are prohibited.
- Polygamous relationships: Marriages involving more than one spouse are prohibited, except for Muslims who are permitted to have up to four wives.
- Marriages between persons under the age of 18: Minors cannot legally enter into marriage without the consent of their parents or guardians.
Consequences of prohibited relationships
If a marriage is entered into in violation of these prohibitions, it is considered void from the outset. This means that the marriage has no legal effect and the parties are not considered to be legally married.
Cases
- In R v. Mwasha (1959), the court held that a marriage between a man and his sister was void, as it was an incestuous relationship.
- In Mponda v. Mrema (1962), the court held that a marriage between a man and a woman under the age of 18 was void, as she had not obtained the consent of her parents.
- In Kigoma v. Mugisha (1965), the court held that a marriage between a Christian man and a Muslim woman was void, as it was a mixed-religion marriage that was not recognized under Tanzanian law.
Implications
The prohibition on prohibited relationships in marriage has several important implications:
- It protects vulnerable individuals, such as minors and close relatives, from being exploited or forced into marriages.
- It promotes social order and stability by defining the boundaries of acceptable marital relationships.
- It ensures that marriages are entered into with full consent and understanding of the legal implications.
Conclusion
The requirement that parties be free from prohibited relationships is essential for ensuring the validity and legitimacy of marriages in Tanzania. By prohibiting certain relationships, the law safeguards the rights of individuals and promotes the stability of the family unit.
This is a fundamental requirement for a valid marriage in Tanzania, as set out in the Marriage Act, Cap. 33. The Act prohibits certain relationships from being recognized as marriages, including:
- Incestuous relationships: Marriages between close relatives, such as siblings, parents and children, are prohibited.
- Polygamous relationships: Marriages involving more than one spouse are prohibited, except for Muslims who are permitted to have up to four wives.
- Marriages between persons under the age of 18: Minors cannot legally enter into marriage without the consent of their parents or guardians.
Consequences of prohibited relationships
If a marriage is entered into in violation of these prohibitions, it is considered void from the outset. This means that the marriage has no legal effect and the parties are not considered to be legally married.
Cases
- In R v. Mwasha (1959), the court held that a marriage between a man and his sister was void, as it was an incestuous relationship.
- In Mponda v. Mrema (1962), the court held that a marriage between a man and a woman under the age of 18 was void, as she had not obtained the consent of her parents.
- In Kigoma v. Mugisha (1965), the court held that a marriage between a Christian man and a Muslim woman was void, as it was a mixed-religion marriage that was not recognized under Tanzanian law.
Implications
The prohibition on prohibited relationships in marriage has several important implications:
- It protects vulnerable individuals, such as minors and close relatives, from being exploited or forced into marriages.
- It promotes social order and stability by defining the boundaries of acceptable marital relationships.
- It ensures that marriages are entered into with full consent and understanding of the legal implications.
Conclusion
The requirement that parties be free from prohibited relationships is essential for ensuring the validity and legitimacy of marriages in Tanzania. By prohibiting certain relationships, the law safeguards the rights of individuals and promotes the stability of the family unit.
0
