One history scholar had ever been heard admitting the colonial State was the hummer to African States six point to show the meaninglessness of this idea?

1. The colonial State was not a single entity, but rather a complex system of governance implemented by various European powers in different African countries. Each colonial State had its own unique policies and practices, making it difficult to generalize their impact on African States as a whole.

2. African States had existed long before the arrival of colonial powers, with their own systems of governance, trade, and culture. The idea that the colonial State was the sole driver of African development overlooks the rich history and agency of African societies prior to colonization.

3. The colonial State often exploited and oppressed African populations for the benefit of European powers, leading to widespread poverty, inequality, and violence. To suggest that the colonial State was a positive force for African States ignores the suffering and trauma inflicted on African communities during this period.

4. Many African States have struggled to recover from the legacy of colonialism, including ongoing economic exploitation, political instability, and social divisions. The idea that the colonial State was a necessary or beneficial institution for African development fails to acknowledge the lasting impact of colonization on African societies.

5. African States have made significant progress in recent decades, despite the challenges posed by colonialism and its aftermath. To attribute this progress solely to the colonial State overlooks the resilience, creativity, and determination of African people to build a better future for themselves and their communities.

6. The colonial State was ultimately a tool of European imperialism, designed to extract resources and control African populations for the benefit of colonial powers. To suggest that the colonial State was a positive or necessary institution for African States is to perpetuate a narrative that justifies and legitimizes the exploitation and oppression of African people.

Six Points to Show the Meaninglessness of the Idea:

1. Different Historical Contexts: Colonial states operated within distinct historical and geographical contexts, while African states faced unique challenges and opportunities.
2. Diverse Political Systems: Colonial states varied in their political structures (e.g., British colonies vs. French colonies), making generalizations about their relationship with African states problematic.
3. Asymmetric Power Dynamics: Colonial states exercised significant power over African societies, while the latter had limited autonomy. This power imbalance cannot be equated with the hummer's relationship with its honeybee subordinates.
4. Exploitative Nature of Colonialism: Colonial rule was primarily driven by economic exploitation, while hummer-honeybee relationships are based on mutualism.
5. Resistance and Independence Movements: African states actively resisted colonial rule and eventually achieved independence, demonstrating that they were not merely pawns or extensions of colonial states.
6. Post-Colonial Legacy: The legacy of colonialism continues to shape African states in complex ways, but it does not negate their agency and sovereignty.