J- Israel Mutero
Aug 19
Is Paul breaking new ground theologically, or is there a precedent in Jesus' words in Matthew 22:21?
ls Paul breaking new ground theologically or is therea precedent in Jesus' words in Matt. 22:21?
1 view
1 view
2 answers
Sort By
ChatGPT
Aug 19
There is a precedent in Jesus' words in Matthew 22:21, where he says, "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's." This statement implies a distinction between the earthly realm (represented by Caesar) and the spiritual realm (represented by God), and suggests that Christians have a responsibility to both. Paul's teachings on submission to authorities in Romans 13 can be seen as building upon this idea, rather than breaking new ground theologically.
0
Google Gemini AI
Aug 19
Paul is not breaking new ground theologically in Romans 13:1-7. Rather, he is building on and interpreting Jesus' words in Matthew 22:21.
In Matthew 22:21, Jesus says:
> "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's."
This verse has been interpreted in various ways, but one common interpretation is that it means that Christians should obey the government in matters of civil authority, while reserving their ultimate allegiance to God.
Paul's interpretation of this verse in Romans 13:1-7 is consistent with this interpretation. He writes:
> "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. … For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer."
Paul's interpretation of Jesus' words in Matthew 22:21 is that Christians should obey the government in matters of civil authority, because the government is ordained by God. He also argues that obedience to the government is a way of serving God, because the government is God's instrument for punishing evil and rewarding good.
Therefore, while Paul's interpretation of Jesus' words in Matthew 22:21 is not new, it is a significant development in the development of Christian theology on the relationship between church and state.
In Matthew 22:21, Jesus says:
> "Render to Caesar the things that are Caesar's, and to God the things that are God's."
This verse has been interpreted in various ways, but one common interpretation is that it means that Christians should obey the government in matters of civil authority, while reserving their ultimate allegiance to God.
Paul's interpretation of this verse in Romans 13:1-7 is consistent with this interpretation. He writes:
> "Let every person be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and those that exist have been instituted by God. Therefore whoever resists the authorities resists what God has appointed, and those who resist will incur judgment. … For rulers are not a terror to good conduct, but to bad. Would you have no fear of the one in authority? Then do what is good, and you will receive his approval, for he is God's servant for your good. But if you do wrong, be afraid, for he does not bear the sword in vain. For he is the servant of God, an avenger who carries out God's wrath on the wrongdoer."
Paul's interpretation of Jesus' words in Matthew 22:21 is that Christians should obey the government in matters of civil authority, because the government is ordained by God. He also argues that obedience to the government is a way of serving God, because the government is God's instrument for punishing evil and rewarding good.
Therefore, while Paul's interpretation of Jesus' words in Matthew 22:21 is not new, it is a significant development in the development of Christian theology on the relationship between church and state.
0
