Anonymous
Dec 29, 2023
How does teaching differ in approaches as suggested by Paul Ramsden 1992? Explain what you think works best in Tanzania?
1 view
1 view
1 answer
Sort By
ChatGPT
Dec 29, 2023
Paul Ramsden (1992) proposed two approaches to teaching: the surface approach and the deep approach. These approaches differ in their focus and strategies for learning.
1. Surface Approach: This approach involves a superficial understanding of the subject matter. Students using this approach tend to focus on memorization and reproducing information without fully understanding it. They may rely on rote learning and prioritize achieving good grades over deep comprehension. The teaching methods associated with this approach often involve lectures, note-taking, and assessments that emphasize recall.
2. Deep Approach: In contrast, the deep approach encourages students to engage with the subject matter in a meaningful way. Students using this approach seek to understand concepts, make connections, and apply knowledge to real-world situations. They prioritize critical thinking, analysis, and synthesis of information. Teaching methods associated with this approach include active learning, discussions, problem-solving, and open-ended assessments.
In the context of Tanzania, the deep approach to teaching is likely to be more effective. Here's why:
1. Promotes Critical Thinking: The deep approach encourages students to think critically and analyze information. This is crucial in Tanzania, where the education system aims to develop students' problem-solving skills and prepare them for higher education and the job market.
2. Fosters Active Learning: Active learning methods, such as group work, discussions, and hands-on activities, are more engaging for students. In Tanzania, where classrooms are often overcrowded, active learning can help students stay motivated and involved in the learning process.
3. Encourages Application of Knowledge: The deep approach emphasizes the application of knowledge to real-life situations. This is beneficial in Tanzania, where students need to develop practical skills that can be used in their future careers.
4. Supports Holistic Development: The deep approach focuses on understanding concepts rather than memorization. This approach aligns with Tanzania's education goals of promoting holistic development, including critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity.
While the deep approach is generally more effective, it is important to consider the specific context and needs of students in Tanzania. Adapting teaching methods to suit the local culture, resources, and infrastructure is crucial for successful implementation. Additionally, a combination of both approaches may be beneficial, as some topics may require a more surface-level understanding before delving deeper.
1. Surface Approach: This approach involves a superficial understanding of the subject matter. Students using this approach tend to focus on memorization and reproducing information without fully understanding it. They may rely on rote learning and prioritize achieving good grades over deep comprehension. The teaching methods associated with this approach often involve lectures, note-taking, and assessments that emphasize recall.
2. Deep Approach: In contrast, the deep approach encourages students to engage with the subject matter in a meaningful way. Students using this approach seek to understand concepts, make connections, and apply knowledge to real-world situations. They prioritize critical thinking, analysis, and synthesis of information. Teaching methods associated with this approach include active learning, discussions, problem-solving, and open-ended assessments.
In the context of Tanzania, the deep approach to teaching is likely to be more effective. Here's why:
1. Promotes Critical Thinking: The deep approach encourages students to think critically and analyze information. This is crucial in Tanzania, where the education system aims to develop students' problem-solving skills and prepare them for higher education and the job market.
2. Fosters Active Learning: Active learning methods, such as group work, discussions, and hands-on activities, are more engaging for students. In Tanzania, where classrooms are often overcrowded, active learning can help students stay motivated and involved in the learning process.
3. Encourages Application of Knowledge: The deep approach emphasizes the application of knowledge to real-life situations. This is beneficial in Tanzania, where students need to develop practical skills that can be used in their future careers.
4. Supports Holistic Development: The deep approach focuses on understanding concepts rather than memorization. This approach aligns with Tanzania's education goals of promoting holistic development, including critical thinking, problem-solving, and creativity.
While the deep approach is generally more effective, it is important to consider the specific context and needs of students in Tanzania. Adapting teaching methods to suit the local culture, resources, and infrastructure is crucial for successful implementation. Additionally, a combination of both approaches may be beneficial, as some topics may require a more surface-level understanding before delving deeper.
0
