Examples of countries where leaders holding public funds has not been taught and they run their work effectively?

One example of a country where leaders holding public funds has not been an issue is Singapore. The government of Singapore has a strong anti-corruption stance and has implemented strict laws and regulations to prevent corruption and misuse of public funds. As a result, Singapore has consistently ranked as one of the least corrupt countries in the world and its leaders are known for their integrity and accountability in managing public funds.

Another example is Denmark, where transparency and accountability in government spending are highly valued. The Danish government has implemented measures such as open data initiatives and public audits to ensure that public funds are used efficiently and effectively. As a result, Denmark has a reputation for having a clean and transparent government with low levels of corruption.

In both of these examples, the leaders of these countries have demonstrated a commitment to upholding ethical standards and ensuring that public funds are used for the benefit of the citizens. This has helped to build trust in the government and ensure effective governance.

There are no known examples of countries where leaders holding public funds has not been taught and they run their work effectively.

The proper management and accountability of public funds is a fundamental principle of good governance and is essential for promoting transparency, preventing corruption, and ensuring that resources are used efficiently and effectively for the benefit of the public.

Leaders who are not trained or educated in proper financial management practices can often make costly mistakes, leading to financial mismanagement, waste, and corruption. This can have a detrimental impact on the country's economy, development, and the well-being of its citizens.