joyline yegon
Apr 24
Discuss threats to validity using examples?
1 view
1 view
2 answers
Sort By
ChatGPT
Apr 24
Threats to validity refer to factors that can potentially impact the accuracy and reliability of research findings. These threats can come from various sources, such as the study design, data collection methods, or participant characteristics. Here are some examples of threats to validity:
1. Selection bias: This occurs when the sample of participants in a study is not representative of the population being studied. For example, if a study on the effectiveness of a new medication only includes participants who are already in good health, the results may not be generalizable to the broader population.
2. Measurement bias: This occurs when the tools or instruments used to measure variables in a study are not accurate or reliable. For example, if a survey question is worded in a way that is confusing or ambiguous, it may lead to inaccurate responses and biased results.
3. Confounding variables: These are variables that are not accounted for in a study but can influence the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. For example, if a study on the impact of exercise on weight loss does not control for diet, the results may be confounded by the participants' eating habits.
4. Social desirability bias: This occurs when participants in a study provide responses that they believe are socially acceptable, rather than their true opinions or behaviors. For example, participants may underreport their alcohol consumption in a survey due to social stigma associated with heavy drinking.
5. Sampling bias: This occurs when the method used to select participants in a study results in a non-random or unrepresentative sample. For example, if a study on the effects of a new teaching method only includes students from a single school, the results may not be generalizable to students from other schools.
6. Hawthorne effect: This occurs when participants in a study change their behavior or responses because they are aware of being observed. For example, employees may work harder or be more productive during a workplace study because they know they are being monitored.
7. Recall bias: This occurs when participants in a study have difficulty accurately recalling past events or experiences. For example, in a study on childhood trauma, participants may have trouble remembering specific details from their childhood, leading to inaccurate or biased responses.
Overall, it is important for researchers to be aware of these potential threats to validity and take steps to minimize their impact on the study findings. This can include using rigorous study designs, carefully selecting participants, and ensuring that data collection methods are reliable and valid.
1. Selection bias: This occurs when the sample of participants in a study is not representative of the population being studied. For example, if a study on the effectiveness of a new medication only includes participants who are already in good health, the results may not be generalizable to the broader population.
2. Measurement bias: This occurs when the tools or instruments used to measure variables in a study are not accurate or reliable. For example, if a survey question is worded in a way that is confusing or ambiguous, it may lead to inaccurate responses and biased results.
3. Confounding variables: These are variables that are not accounted for in a study but can influence the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. For example, if a study on the impact of exercise on weight loss does not control for diet, the results may be confounded by the participants' eating habits.
4. Social desirability bias: This occurs when participants in a study provide responses that they believe are socially acceptable, rather than their true opinions or behaviors. For example, participants may underreport their alcohol consumption in a survey due to social stigma associated with heavy drinking.
5. Sampling bias: This occurs when the method used to select participants in a study results in a non-random or unrepresentative sample. For example, if a study on the effects of a new teaching method only includes students from a single school, the results may not be generalizable to students from other schools.
6. Hawthorne effect: This occurs when participants in a study change their behavior or responses because they are aware of being observed. For example, employees may work harder or be more productive during a workplace study because they know they are being monitored.
7. Recall bias: This occurs when participants in a study have difficulty accurately recalling past events or experiences. For example, in a study on childhood trauma, participants may have trouble remembering specific details from their childhood, leading to inaccurate or biased responses.
Overall, it is important for researchers to be aware of these potential threats to validity and take steps to minimize their impact on the study findings. This can include using rigorous study designs, carefully selecting participants, and ensuring that data collection methods are reliable and valid.
0
Google Gemini AI
Apr 24
Threats to Internal Validity
- Confounding variables: Uncontrolled factors that influence the outcome, making it difficult to determine the true effect of the independent variable.
- Example: In a study of the effectiveness of a new drug, the participants may also be receiving a placebo or another medication that could affect the results.
- Selection bias: Differences between the treatment and control groups before the intervention, making it difficult to attribute any differences in outcomes to the intervention.
- Example: In a study comparing two teaching methods, the students in one group may be more motivated or have prior knowledge than the students in the other group.
- History effects: Events that occur during the study that could confound the results.
- Example: In a study of the effects of a new social media platform on user engagement, a major news event that occurs during the study period could affect usage patterns.
- Maturation: Changes in the participants over time that are not related to the intervention.
- Example: In a study of the effects of an early intervention program on cognitive development, the participants in both groups may experience natural cognitive development over time.
- Instrumentation: Changes in measurement tools or procedures that could affect the results.
- Example: In a study of the effects of a new therapy on depression, the therapists may change their approach over time, affecting the results.
Threats to External Validity
- Sample bias: The sample is not representative of the target population, making it difficult to generalize the results.
- Example: A study of the effects of a new exercise program is conducted on a group of healthy volunteers, but the results may not generalize to the general population.
- Reactivity: The participants' awareness of the study affects their behavior, influencing the results.
- Example: In a study of the effects of a new reward system on employee productivity, the employees may work harder because they know they are being observed.
- Context effects: The setting in which the study is conducted affects the results, making it difficult to generalize to other settings.
- Example: A study of the effects of a new educational intervention is conducted in a low-income school, but the results may not generalize to schools with different socioeconomic demographics.
- Demand characteristics: Cues from the researchers or the study design that unintentionally influence the participants' behavior.
- Example: In a study of the effects of a new leadership style, the participants may behave differently because they know they are being led by a different leader.
- Confounding variables: Uncontrolled factors that influence the outcome, making it difficult to determine the true effect of the independent variable.
- Example: In a study of the effectiveness of a new drug, the participants may also be receiving a placebo or another medication that could affect the results.
- Selection bias: Differences between the treatment and control groups before the intervention, making it difficult to attribute any differences in outcomes to the intervention.
- Example: In a study comparing two teaching methods, the students in one group may be more motivated or have prior knowledge than the students in the other group.
- History effects: Events that occur during the study that could confound the results.
- Example: In a study of the effects of a new social media platform on user engagement, a major news event that occurs during the study period could affect usage patterns.
- Maturation: Changes in the participants over time that are not related to the intervention.
- Example: In a study of the effects of an early intervention program on cognitive development, the participants in both groups may experience natural cognitive development over time.
- Instrumentation: Changes in measurement tools or procedures that could affect the results.
- Example: In a study of the effects of a new therapy on depression, the therapists may change their approach over time, affecting the results.
Threats to External Validity
- Sample bias: The sample is not representative of the target population, making it difficult to generalize the results.
- Example: A study of the effects of a new exercise program is conducted on a group of healthy volunteers, but the results may not generalize to the general population.
- Reactivity: The participants' awareness of the study affects their behavior, influencing the results.
- Example: In a study of the effects of a new reward system on employee productivity, the employees may work harder because they know they are being observed.
- Context effects: The setting in which the study is conducted affects the results, making it difficult to generalize to other settings.
- Example: A study of the effects of a new educational intervention is conducted in a low-income school, but the results may not generalize to schools with different socioeconomic demographics.
- Demand characteristics: Cues from the researchers or the study design that unintentionally influence the participants' behavior.
- Example: In a study of the effects of a new leadership style, the participants may behave differently because they know they are being led by a different leader.
0
