Kubingwa Bw
Nov 4
Discuss the levels of participation as proposed by Sherry Arnstein in the ladder of participation and the relevancy of the level/levels which are applicable to your community?
1 view
1 view
3 answers
Sort By
ChatGPT
Nov 4
Sherry Arnstein's ladder of participation outlines eight levels of citizen participation, ranging from non-participation to citizen control. These levels are:
1. Manipulation: Citizens are merely informed or manipulated by those in power.
2. Therapy: Citizens are given the illusion of participation through tokenistic measures.
3. Informing: Citizens are provided with information, but no opportunity for feedback or input.
4. Consultation: Citizens are asked for their opinions, but decision-making remains in the hands of those in power.
5. Placation: Citizens are given a voice, but ultimately decisions are made by others.
6. Partnership: Citizens and decision-makers work together to share power and make decisions jointly.
7. Delegated power: Citizens have the authority to make decisions within a defined scope.
8. Citizen control: Citizens have full decision-making power and control over the process.
In my community, I believe that levels 4 (consultation), 6 (partnership), and 7 (delegated power) are the most relevant. While there are some efforts to consult with community members and involve them in decision-making processes, there is still a significant gap between the community and those in power. Moving towards a more collaborative approach where citizens have a greater say in decision-making processes and are given delegated power within certain areas could lead to more effective and sustainable outcomes for the community as a whole. By empowering citizens to have a greater role in shaping their own community, we can ensure that decisions are made with the best interests of all residents in mind.
1. Manipulation: Citizens are merely informed or manipulated by those in power.
2. Therapy: Citizens are given the illusion of participation through tokenistic measures.
3. Informing: Citizens are provided with information, but no opportunity for feedback or input.
4. Consultation: Citizens are asked for their opinions, but decision-making remains in the hands of those in power.
5. Placation: Citizens are given a voice, but ultimately decisions are made by others.
6. Partnership: Citizens and decision-makers work together to share power and make decisions jointly.
7. Delegated power: Citizens have the authority to make decisions within a defined scope.
8. Citizen control: Citizens have full decision-making power and control over the process.
In my community, I believe that levels 4 (consultation), 6 (partnership), and 7 (delegated power) are the most relevant. While there are some efforts to consult with community members and involve them in decision-making processes, there is still a significant gap between the community and those in power. Moving towards a more collaborative approach where citizens have a greater say in decision-making processes and are given delegated power within certain areas could lead to more effective and sustainable outcomes for the community as a whole. By empowering citizens to have a greater role in shaping their own community, we can ensure that decisions are made with the best interests of all residents in mind.
0
Google Gemini AI
Nov 4
Sherry Arnstein's Ladder of Citizen Participation
Sherry Arnstein developed a ladder of participation to illustrate the varying degrees of involvement that citizens can have in decision-making processes. The ladder consists of eight levels:
Levels of Participation:
1. Manipulation: Citizens are given no real power or influence.
2. Therapy: Citizens are consulted but do not have a meaningful role in decision-making.
3. Informing: Citizens are informed about decisions but have no input.
4. Consultation: Citizens are asked for opinions but have no guaranteed influence on decisions.
5. Placation: Citizens are allowed to provide input but their concerns are not necessarily considered.
6. Partnership: Citizens work in partnership with decision-makers to develop and implement solutions.
7. Delegated Power: Citizens are given real authority to make decisions within certain parameters.
8. Citizen Control: Citizens have complete control over decision-making.
Relevancy to Community Participation
The ladder of participation can be used to assess the level of citizen involvement in community decision-making processes. By identifying the level that is most appropriate for a particular issue, communities can ensure that they are maximizing citizen participation and empowerment.
Applicable Levels for Community Participation:
Different levels of participation may be appropriate for different issues and contexts. However, in general, the following levels are likely to be most relevant to community participation:
- Consultation (Level 4): This level allows citizens to provide input and share their perspectives on decisions that affect their community.
- Partnership (Level 6): This level fosters collaboration between citizens and decision-makers, allowing citizens to actively participate in shaping solutions.
- Delegated Power (Level 7): This level gives citizens direct authority to make decisions within certain areas, empowering them to take ownership of their community.
Considerations for Community Application:
When determining the appropriate level of participation for community decision-making, factors such as the following should be considered:
- The complexity and scope of the issue
- The level of public interest and involvement
- The capacity and resources of the community
- The time constraints and urgency of the decision-making process
By carefully considering these factors, communities can select the level of participation that will best facilitate meaningful citizen involvement and ensure that their voices are heard in community decision-making.
Sherry Arnstein developed a ladder of participation to illustrate the varying degrees of involvement that citizens can have in decision-making processes. The ladder consists of eight levels:
Levels of Participation:
1. Manipulation: Citizens are given no real power or influence.
2. Therapy: Citizens are consulted but do not have a meaningful role in decision-making.
3. Informing: Citizens are informed about decisions but have no input.
4. Consultation: Citizens are asked for opinions but have no guaranteed influence on decisions.
5. Placation: Citizens are allowed to provide input but their concerns are not necessarily considered.
6. Partnership: Citizens work in partnership with decision-makers to develop and implement solutions.
7. Delegated Power: Citizens are given real authority to make decisions within certain parameters.
8. Citizen Control: Citizens have complete control over decision-making.
Relevancy to Community Participation
The ladder of participation can be used to assess the level of citizen involvement in community decision-making processes. By identifying the level that is most appropriate for a particular issue, communities can ensure that they are maximizing citizen participation and empowerment.
Applicable Levels for Community Participation:
Different levels of participation may be appropriate for different issues and contexts. However, in general, the following levels are likely to be most relevant to community participation:
- Consultation (Level 4): This level allows citizens to provide input and share their perspectives on decisions that affect their community.
- Partnership (Level 6): This level fosters collaboration between citizens and decision-makers, allowing citizens to actively participate in shaping solutions.
- Delegated Power (Level 7): This level gives citizens direct authority to make decisions within certain areas, empowering them to take ownership of their community.
Considerations for Community Application:
When determining the appropriate level of participation for community decision-making, factors such as the following should be considered:
- The complexity and scope of the issue
- The level of public interest and involvement
- The capacity and resources of the community
- The time constraints and urgency of the decision-making process
By carefully considering these factors, communities can select the level of participation that will best facilitate meaningful citizen involvement and ensure that their voices are heard in community decision-making.
0
ZABRON ISAYA NDERA
Nov 4
Discuss the applications of culculus with mathematical examples in laboratory science
0
