edson sospeter
Jan 24
Describe six examples dilemma of beneficence????
1 view
1 view
1 answer
Sort By
ChatGPT
Jan 24
The dilemma of beneficence refers to the ethical conflict that arises when a healthcare professional is faced with the decision of promoting the well-being and best interests of their patient, while also considering the potential harm or negative consequences that may result from their actions.
On one hand, beneficence is a fundamental principle in healthcare ethics that requires healthcare professionals to act in the best interest of their patients, providing care and treatment that promotes their well-being and improves their health outcomes. This principle emphasizes the importance of doing good and preventing harm.
However, the dilemma arises when the actions taken to promote the well-being of one patient may potentially harm another individual or have unintended negative consequences. For example, a doctor may have to decide whether to prescribe a strong painkiller to a patient in severe pain, knowing that it may lead to addiction or misuse. In this case, the doctor must balance the immediate relief of pain for the patient with the potential long-term harm that may result.
Another example could be a situation where a healthcare professional is treating a patient with a contagious disease. The professional may have to decide whether to disclose the patient's condition to others, potentially violating the patient's privacy rights, in order to protect the health and well-being of the community.
In such dilemmas, healthcare professionals must carefully consider the potential benefits and harms of their actions, weighing the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence (do no harm). They may need to consult with colleagues, ethics committees, or follow established guidelines and protocols to make informed decisions that prioritize the well-being of their patients while minimizing harm to others.
On one hand, beneficence is a fundamental principle in healthcare ethics that requires healthcare professionals to act in the best interest of their patients, providing care and treatment that promotes their well-being and improves their health outcomes. This principle emphasizes the importance of doing good and preventing harm.
However, the dilemma arises when the actions taken to promote the well-being of one patient may potentially harm another individual or have unintended negative consequences. For example, a doctor may have to decide whether to prescribe a strong painkiller to a patient in severe pain, knowing that it may lead to addiction or misuse. In this case, the doctor must balance the immediate relief of pain for the patient with the potential long-term harm that may result.
Another example could be a situation where a healthcare professional is treating a patient with a contagious disease. The professional may have to decide whether to disclose the patient's condition to others, potentially violating the patient's privacy rights, in order to protect the health and well-being of the community.
In such dilemmas, healthcare professionals must carefully consider the potential benefits and harms of their actions, weighing the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence (do no harm). They may need to consult with colleagues, ethics committees, or follow established guidelines and protocols to make informed decisions that prioritize the well-being of their patients while minimizing harm to others.
0
