OMARI MAULIDI
Nov 17, 2023
#community-resource-mobilisation
#traditional-communication
#merits
#communication
#modern-communication
DeMerits of traditional and modern form of communication in community resource mobilisation ? ?
Text
1 view
1 view
1 answer
Sort By
ChatGPT
Nov 17, 2023
Traditional form of communication in community resource mobilization refers to methods that have been used for centuries, such as face-to-face meetings, word-of-mouth, and printed materials. On the other hand, modern forms of communication include digital platforms, social media, and online campaigns. Both traditional and modern forms of communication have their own merits in community resource mobilization.
Merits of Traditional Communication:
1. Personal Connection: Traditional communication allows for direct interaction and personal connection between individuals. Face-to-face meetings and conversations build trust and rapport, making it easier to mobilize resources within the community.
2. Local Relevance: Traditional communication methods are often more effective in reaching local communities. Printed materials, community gatherings, and local events can be tailored to specific cultural and linguistic contexts, ensuring better understanding and engagement.
3. Inclusivity: Traditional communication methods can be more inclusive, especially in communities with limited access to technology. They ensure that everyone, regardless of their digital literacy or access to the internet, can participate in resource mobilization efforts.
Merits of Modern Communication:
1. Wide Reach: Modern communication methods have the potential to reach a larger audience. Social media platforms, online campaigns, and email newsletters can spread information quickly and efficiently, reaching individuals beyond the local community.
2. Cost-Effective: Digital communication methods are often more cost-effective compared to traditional methods. Creating and sharing online content is relatively inexpensive, allowing organizations to allocate more resources towards the actual mobilization efforts.
3. Real-Time Engagement: Modern communication allows for real-time engagement and feedback. Online platforms enable immediate responses, discussions, and collaboration, facilitating faster decision-making and resource allocation.
In conclusion, both traditional and modern forms of communication have their own merits in community resource mobilization. Traditional methods provide a personal touch, local relevance, and inclusivity, while modern methods offer wider reach, cost-effectiveness, and real-time engagement. A combination of both approaches can be the most effective strategy for mobilizing resources within a community.
Merits of Traditional Communication:
1. Personal Connection: Traditional communication allows for direct interaction and personal connection between individuals. Face-to-face meetings and conversations build trust and rapport, making it easier to mobilize resources within the community.
2. Local Relevance: Traditional communication methods are often more effective in reaching local communities. Printed materials, community gatherings, and local events can be tailored to specific cultural and linguistic contexts, ensuring better understanding and engagement.
3. Inclusivity: Traditional communication methods can be more inclusive, especially in communities with limited access to technology. They ensure that everyone, regardless of their digital literacy or access to the internet, can participate in resource mobilization efforts.
Merits of Modern Communication:
1. Wide Reach: Modern communication methods have the potential to reach a larger audience. Social media platforms, online campaigns, and email newsletters can spread information quickly and efficiently, reaching individuals beyond the local community.
2. Cost-Effective: Digital communication methods are often more cost-effective compared to traditional methods. Creating and sharing online content is relatively inexpensive, allowing organizations to allocate more resources towards the actual mobilization efforts.
3. Real-Time Engagement: Modern communication allows for real-time engagement and feedback. Online platforms enable immediate responses, discussions, and collaboration, facilitating faster decision-making and resource allocation.
In conclusion, both traditional and modern forms of communication have their own merits in community resource mobilization. Traditional methods provide a personal touch, local relevance, and inclusivity, while modern methods offer wider reach, cost-effectiveness, and real-time engagement. A combination of both approaches can be the most effective strategy for mobilizing resources within a community.
0
