Compare and contrast the 1995 constitution and 1987 constitution of Ethiopia?
Detaily
6 views
6 views
2
answers
Sort By
ChatGPT
May 28
The 1995 constitution of Ethiopia and the 1987 constitution of Ethiopia have several key differences and similarities.
One major difference between the two constitutions is the process by which they were adopted. The 1987 constitution was adopted by a military government, the Derg, while the 1995 constitution was adopted by a transitional government following the overthrow of the Derg. This difference in the adoption process reflects the different political contexts in which the two constitutions were created.
Another key difference between the two constitutions is the structure of government they establish. The 1987 constitution established a one-party state with a strong central government, while the 1995 constitution established a federal system with a bicameral parliament and a system of checks and balances between the federal and regional governments. This shift towards federalism in the 1995 constitution was intended to address the ethnic diversity of Ethiopia and promote greater autonomy for the country's regions.
Despite these differences, both the 1987 and 1995 constitutions share some similarities. For example, both constitutions guarantee certain fundamental rights and freedoms to Ethiopian citizens, such as the right to freedom of expression, assembly, and religion. Additionally, both constitutions establish the principles of separation of powers and rule of law as foundational principles of the Ethiopian state.
In conclusion, while the 1987 and 1995 constitutions of Ethiopia differ in terms of their adoption process and structure of government, they also share some key similarities in terms of the rights and principles they enshrine. The 1995 constitution represents a significant departure from the 1987 constitution in terms of its federal structure and emphasis on ethnic diversity, reflecting the changing political landscape in Ethiopia at the time of its adoption.
0
Google Gemini AI
May 28
1987 Constitution
- Political system: Democratic centralist republic with a one-party state (Ethiopian Workers' Party). - Head of state: President, elected by parliament. - Head of government: Prime Minister, appointed by the President. - Legislature: People's Assembly, elected by popular vote. - Judiciary: Supreme Court, appointed by the President. - Military: Strong military, with a history of intervention in politics. - Rights and freedoms: Limited, with emphasis on collective rights over individual rights. - Economic policy: Marxist-inspired command economy. - Foreign policy: Non-aligned, with a focus on socialism and solidarity with other revolutionary movements.
1995 Constitution
- Political system: Federal parliamentary republic with a multi-party system. - Head of state: President, elected by parliament. - Head of government: Prime Minister, appointed by the President with the approval of parliament. - Legislature: Federal Parliament, with two chambers: House of People's Representatives and House of Federation. - Judiciary: Supreme Court, appointed by the President with the approval of parliament. - Military: Reduced role in politics, with civilian oversight. - Rights and freedoms: Expanded, with protections for individual rights, freedom of speech, and religious freedom. - Economic policy: Market-oriented economy, with a focus on private enterprise and foreign investment. - Foreign policy: Independent, with a focus on regional cooperation and peacebuilding.
Key Differences
- Political system: The 1995 constitution transitioned Ethiopia from a one-party state to a multi-party democracy. - Rights and freedoms: The 1995 constitution expanded protections for individual rights and freedoms. - Economic policy: The 1995 constitution shifted Ethiopia's economy from a command economy to a market-oriented economy. - Military: The 1995 constitution reduced the military's role in politics and established civilian oversight. - Foreign policy: The 1995 constitution moved Ethiopia away from a non-aligned stance towards a more independent foreign policy.