3 criteria 3 criteria?

1. Relevance: The criteria should be directly related to the topic or issue being evaluated.

2. Objectivity: The criteria should be measurable and based on facts rather than personal opinions or biases.

3. Consistency: The criteria should be consistently applied to all options being evaluated to ensure fairness and accuracy in the assessment process.

1. Relevance: The criterion of relevance requires that evidence be logically related to the fact or issue in dispute. In other words, the evidence must tend to prove or disprove the fact or issue in question.
2. Reliability: The criterion of reliability requires that evidence be trustworthy and believable. In other words, the evidence must be free from error or bias.
3. Sufficiency: The criterion of sufficiency requires that there be enough evidence to support a finding of fact or a conclusion of law. In other words, the evidence must be sufficient to convince a reasonable person that the fact or issue in dispute is true.