>
#comparative-ethics
,
#normative-ethics
,
#ethics
>
What are the differences and similarities between normative ethics?
Bella Man
Mar 17
What are the differences and similarities between normative ethics?
1. Normative ethics
A. Teleological (Consequentialist) Ethical Theories
- Egoism (Ethical and psychological egoism)
- Utilitarianism ( Classic Utilitarianism, Act Vs Rule Utilitarianism, Quantity Over Quality Vs Quality Over Quantity)
- Altruism
B. Deontological (Non-consquentialsim)
- Divine Command Theory (DCT)
- Kant’s categorical imperative
- Rosa's Prima Facie Duties
C. Virtue Ethics
2. Non-normative Ethics (Meta-ethics)
- Cognivitism vs Non-Cognitivism
- Internalism and Externalism, Humeanism and Anti- Humeanism.
A. Teleological (Consequentialist) Ethical Theories
- Egoism (Ethical and psychological egoism)
- Utilitarianism ( Classic Utilitarianism, Act Vs Rule Utilitarianism, Quantity Over Quality Vs Quality Over Quantity)
- Altruism
B. Deontological (Non-consquentialsim)
- Divine Command Theory (DCT)
- Kant’s categorical imperative
- Rosa's Prima Facie Duties
C. Virtue Ethics
2. Non-normative Ethics (Meta-ethics)
- Cognivitism vs Non-Cognitivism
- Internalism and Externalism, Humeanism and Anti- Humeanism.
1 view
1 view
2 answers
Sort By
ChatGPT
Mar 17
Normative ethics is a branch of ethics that deals with the principles of right and wrong behavior. There are several different approaches to normative ethics, each with its own set of principles and guidelines. Some of the main differences and similarities between these approaches include:
1. Deontological ethics: Deontological ethics, also known as duty-based ethics, focuses on the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions themselves, rather than the consequences of those actions. This approach is often associated with philosophers like Immanuel Kant, who argued that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of their outcomes. Deontological ethics is based on the idea of moral duties and obligations that individuals have towards others.
2. Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism is a consequentialist approach to ethics that focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being. According to utilitarianism, the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by its consequences, specifically the amount of happiness or pleasure it produces. This approach is associated with philosophers like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, who argued that the goal of ethics should be to promote the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
3. Virtue ethics: Virtue ethics focuses on the character traits or virtues that individuals should cultivate in order to lead a good and fulfilling life. This approach is associated with philosophers like Aristotle, who argued that the key to ethical behavior is developing virtuous character traits like courage, honesty, and compassion. Virtue ethics emphasizes the importance of personal integrity and moral excellence in guiding ethical decision-making.
In terms of differences, deontological ethics emphasizes the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions, while utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of actions and maximizing overall happiness. Virtue ethics, on the other hand, emphasizes the importance of developing virtuous character traits in order to lead a good and fulfilling life.
Despite these differences, all three approaches to normative ethics share a common goal of guiding individuals towards ethical behavior and promoting the well-being of others. They all seek to provide a framework for making moral decisions and determining what is right or wrong in a given situation.
1. Deontological ethics: Deontological ethics, also known as duty-based ethics, focuses on the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions themselves, rather than the consequences of those actions. This approach is often associated with philosophers like Immanuel Kant, who argued that certain actions are inherently right or wrong, regardless of their outcomes. Deontological ethics is based on the idea of moral duties and obligations that individuals have towards others.
2. Utilitarianism: Utilitarianism is a consequentialist approach to ethics that focuses on maximizing overall happiness or well-being. According to utilitarianism, the rightness or wrongness of an action is determined by its consequences, specifically the amount of happiness or pleasure it produces. This approach is associated with philosophers like Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill, who argued that the goal of ethics should be to promote the greatest good for the greatest number of people.
3. Virtue ethics: Virtue ethics focuses on the character traits or virtues that individuals should cultivate in order to lead a good and fulfilling life. This approach is associated with philosophers like Aristotle, who argued that the key to ethical behavior is developing virtuous character traits like courage, honesty, and compassion. Virtue ethics emphasizes the importance of personal integrity and moral excellence in guiding ethical decision-making.
In terms of differences, deontological ethics emphasizes the inherent rightness or wrongness of actions, while utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of actions and maximizing overall happiness. Virtue ethics, on the other hand, emphasizes the importance of developing virtuous character traits in order to lead a good and fulfilling life.
Despite these differences, all three approaches to normative ethics share a common goal of guiding individuals towards ethical behavior and promoting the well-being of others. They all seek to provide a framework for making moral decisions and determining what is right or wrong in a given situation.
0
Bella Man
Mar 17
What about non-normative ethics?
0
