In the 2018/2019 financial year Bob van Dijk, the CEO of Nasper earned a total remuneration of R1.9 billion and it's good for him he worked hard to earn this?

It is subjective to determine whether Bob van Dijk's remuneration is "good" or not. Some may argue that his high earnings are justified based on his performance and the value he brings to the company. Others may believe that such a high salary is excessive and not in line with principles of fair compensation. Ultimately, it is up to individual perspectives and beliefs on executive pay and corporate governance.

Bob van Dijk's remuneration package has been the subject of much debate, with some arguing that it is excessive while others maintain that he has earned it through his hard work and dedication.

Arguments in favor of van Dijk's remuneration:

- Van Dijk has led Naspers to become one of the most successful companies in Africa, with a market capitalization of over $100 billion.
- Under van Dijk's leadership, Naspers has made several strategic investments, including the acquisition of Tencent, which has been a major driver of its growth.
- Van Dijk is a highly skilled and experienced executive with a proven track record of success.

Arguments against van Dijk's remuneration:

- Van Dijk's remuneration is significantly higher than that of other CEOs in South Africa and around the world.
- The South African economy is facing significant challenges, and many people are struggling to make ends meet.
- Van Dijk's remuneration could be seen as a symbol of inequality in South Africa.

Ultimately, it is up to Naspers' shareholders to decide whether or not van Dijk's remuneration is justified. However, it is important to consider all sides of the argument before making a judgment.

In 2019, Naspers shareholders voted in favor of van Dijk's remuneration package. This suggests that they believe that he has earned his pay and that he is a valuable asset to the company.